Real Clients. Real Numbers. No Composite Averages.

Every metric on this page comes from the same dashboards we hand clients access to - Search Console data, AI citation tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, and CRM-attributed lead data where the client has shared it. We don't run projections or model hypothetical outcomes; what's published is what happened, measured against the baseline period before the engagement started.

Not particularly. The industries shown here happen to be where we have the deepest published track record, but the underlying methodology - entity optimization, technical foundations, structured data, and authority building - works the same way regardless of vertical. If your category isn't represented yet, ask us directly; we can usually share a relevant engagement that didn't make it onto this page.

Most of the engagements above started showing measurable AI citation movement somewhere between eight and sixteen weeks in, with the larger traffic and lead-volume gains compounding over two to three quarters. Technical foundations and entity work move faster than backlink-dependent authority signals, so the timeline depends heavily on where your current visibility gaps actually are.

Each case study reflects one specific client engagement. Company names are withheld at the client's request - most operate in competitive or regulated industries and prefer not to broadcast their search strategy to competitors - but the metrics, timelines, and tactics described are specific to that one account, not blended averages.

We track three things specifically: whether a brand is named in the direct response from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, or Google's AI Overviews for a defined set of target queries; whether the brand's content is the linked source behind that response; and how consistently that citation holds up when we re-run the same queries weekly. A one-time mention doesn't count - we're measuring whether the citation persists.