- Overall and category-level scores
- Trend and reporting-period context
- Prioritized findings and recommended action
Measure How Clearly Search and AI Systems Understand Your Brand
Domain Authority told you how many links you had. It never told you whether ChatGPT could parse your product page. The Discoverability Score does - a single 0 to 100 number built from the signals that decide whether AI engines can crawl, understand, and eventually cite what you publish.
Translate technical and entity evidence into a score clients can act on
The module consolidates readiness, technical health, content structure and entity signals into reviewed measurements with clear priorities and source context.
- Run approved technical collectors
- Review schema and entity evidence
- Override or annotate measurements when required
Measurement note: Platform values reflect the stated reporting period, source availability and verification status. Search engines, analytics tools and AI systems can refresh, personalize or revise their outputs, so observed values may differ from a later independent check. Estimated and analyst-modeled values are labelled and should be used as decision support rather than as guaranteed rankings, citations, traffic or revenue.
One Weighted Number.
Whether your pages carry Product, Article, FAQ, and Organization markup that an AI crawler can parse without guessing what a piece of content actually is.
Whether your brand, products, and authors are defined clearly enough for an AI model to connect them to the same entity every time, instead of treating each mention as a fresh unknown.
How consistently crawlers can actually reach and load your pages - response times, broken internal links, and pages that quietly return soft 404s without anyone noticing.
How recently your highest-traffic pages have actually been reviewed or updated, since AI engines weight recency heavily when two sources otherwise look equally credible.
Most sites we onboard land somewhere in the 50s - not because they're poorly built, but because nobody had measured this specific combination of signals before. A score in the Strong band means AI engines can reliably reach and parse your content; it doesn't yet mean they're citing you consistently, which is closer to what the high 80s and 90s represent.
A Score Down
Product, Article, and Organization types left out, or filled in inconsistently across templates built at different times.
Pages that exist on the site but that nothing else links to, making them genuinely hard for any crawler to find.
Pages that load fine for a visitor but time out or error for a crawler under normal load, often without anyone on the team noticing.
The brand, products, or authors aren't tied together consistently enough for an AI model to treat every mention as the same known entity.
Pages that were accurate when published but have quietly gone stale, with no signal anywhere that a human reviewed them recently.
Not Just A Score. A Short List Of What To Fix First.
A score by itself just tells you how you're doing. The platform goes one step further and ranks the handful of fixes that would move the number the most, with a rough point estimate for each one - so the next thing your team works on isn't a guess.
Specifically
Not An Estimate
Practical guidance
Using a Discoverability Score Responsibly
A composite score helps compare signal groups and monitor change. Always inspect the underlying technical, entity, content, and authority evidence before prioritizing work.
What should teams review?
Review source coverage, data freshness, collection method, anomalies, and the business decision each metric is expected to support.
What is the recommended next step?
Start with a defined visibility question and connect only the data required to answer it. Add monitoring after the baseline and ownership are clear.
